Everybody Loses if Procurement Is a Fire Department

Everybody Loses if Procurement Is a Fire Department

If you were walking down the street and saw a person on fire, presumably you would help put out the fire. But what if every single day on your way to work there was another person on fire needing your help? Sure, you have to help, but you would wonder - why are all these people on fire, where’s the fire department and why do I have to be the firefighter? I have a job of my own!

I find this absurd point of view applicable to the way CPOs and their team are positioned in operational and tactical approaches in procurement. You’re either trying to manage chaos of what seems like countless requisitions, maverick buying, disconnect with internal stakeholders, continuous back and forth with suppliers, order mishaps. Or you’re stuck with inaccurate data when negotiating with risky suppliers and you can’t say anything because that’s your only supplier. Not to mention the screaming phone calls and e-mails.

It’s like adding fuel to a never-ending fire. You’re burned-out and you only managed to achieve just the bare minimum for the company because you always have to stop doing things that are important for things that are urgent. And those two things are not synonyms.


Where to start from?

The zero step in trying to alleviate firefighting is actually acknowledging whether you’re a part of a company that encourages and eventually rewards that kind of behavior. If that is the case, it  will be a great challenge to change, but not impossible. No matter the culture of a company, not one of them will say no to better savings, added value and consequently increased shareholder value. First you need to adequately recognize what is top management’s driving force, whether their focus is on: short term cost savings, sustainable growth, risk mitigation, implementing operational procedures, enforcing ethical norms or standards, etc. Then the approach is to start with small steps, i.e. by identifying low hanging fruit that the company didn’t already pick and then building on those results. Because firefighting will only keep the company afloat, but strategic perspectives will keep it growing.

That’s the picture top management and internal stakeholders need to see from procurement and they will welcome it with open arms if the picture is drawn just right.


How to draw the rest of that picture?

In my view these are actionable steps  on how to transform procurement into a truly strategic function:

  1. Identify internal stakeholders, who are not always easy to recognize, especially in multi-location, multi-business units / brands
  2. Develop procurement strategy that addresses business requirements and stakeholder expectations
  3. Diagnose gaps in own performance and competences to drive the new strategy
  4. Develop procurement transition plan in order to transform procurement into a strategic function
  5. Select people with the right competences who can deliver strategy implementation
  6. Develop strategies for categories, then for risks and suppliers - Category / Risk / Supplier Management
  7. Install Key Performance Indicators at all levels to monitor the implementation of the strategy


As support to the above described process, digital tools at certain stages become invaluable because they provide structure, discipline and lead the procurement management confidently through extensive amounts of content.

It is my strong belief that once CPOs and their team are armed with this kind of knowledge, they will be able to eliminate their firefighting activities, because their experience and expertise can be put to far better use and grow accordingly.

Let’s just make one thing clear, this process is not instant. It requires courage, dedication, leadership and strategic competences, but if implemented it will discover strategic visionaries instead of a fire department.


Be sure to follow my company LinkedIn page where industry insights will be posted.



Stephen Reed

IT Career Success Executive | Councillor | Business Analyst | Cyber Student

4y

Great Read, Thanks for Sharing.

Like
Reply
Christophe Bonduelle

Enterprise Architect / Digital Enthousiast

6y
Like
Reply

Procurement management don't have to spend 75% of time fighting fires. They report to CFO's whom represent SCM at Executive level. Most CFO's counts money with restricted knowledge/ expertise re SCM which they supposed to Lead and direct. Latest trend is to appoint CPO's ( Chief Procurement Officers ) in companies like at National Treasury in SA where Minister of Finance or his DG will have "CFO" role. If an organization doesn't have a Strat Planning processes and integrated Management thereof then different Departments won't have Bness plans with Budgets to indicate when will what be required for Production and from whom and what it will cost( Strat sourcing and especially for OEM manufacturing). If an ERP system is being utilized then I don't foresee any fire fighting. Worked for Manufacturing Division of biggest State Owned Enterprise in SA supporting five BU's ( loco's; wagons; wheels ; tarpaulins & auxiliary services). Each BU incl Support Service like SCM & HR operated as Profit centres and not traditional Cost centres. BU's had option to refuse monthly payments if not happy with Service of SCM or HR.

Like
Reply
Vivian Morgan

Procurement Team Lead | Procurement Manager | Senior Buyer | Sourcing Specialist|

6y

Living this dream... automation and data quality helps to eliminate some of the fires.

Like
Reply
ELDA REVILLA

Currently seeking for new opportunity

6y

Very constructive...congratulation.

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Others also viewed

Explore topics